A Study on the Wildland Fire Risk Assessment of Cultural Properties in Wildland-urban Interface

doi:None

All Issue

2022 Vol.7, Issue 1 Preview Page Next Page

Article

A Study on the Wildland Fire Risk Assessment of Cultural Properties in Wildland-urban Interface 산림인접 문화재의 산불위험성 평가에 관한 연구: 류주열¹ㆍ김성용²ㆍ서경원³ㆍ권춘근^4†
Ryu, Juyeol¹ㆍKim, Sungyong²ㆍSeo, Kyungwon³ㆍKwon, Chungeun^4†; ¹국립산림과학원 산불산사태연구과 박사연구원
²국립산림과학원 산불산사태연구과 임업연구사
³국립산림과학원 산불산사태연구과 임업연구관
⁴국립산림과학원 산불산사태연구과 임업연구사

¹Researcher, Division of Forest Fire and Landslide, National Institute of Forest Science
²Junior Researcher, Division of Forest Fire and Landslide, National Institute of Forest Science
³Senior Researcher, Division of Forest Fire and Landslide, National Institute of Forest Science
⁴Junior Researcher, Division of Forest Fire and Landslide, National Institute of Forest Science

30 April 2022. pp. 25-36

PDF

Abstract

This research developed an evaluation table that can be used for forest fire prevention and management was developed by evaluating the risks such as accessibility of firefighting equipment, characteristics of building materials, surrounding clinical conditions, and availability of firefighting resources in order to reduce the damage caused by large-scale forest fires on cultural heritage adjacent to forests, We analyzed the wildfire risk assessment of wildland-urban interface in foreign, and deduced forest fire risk factors and damage factors at the sites damaged by forest fires in Korea, and suggested a forest fire risk assessment table suitable for domestic conditions. In addition, in order to increase the usability and reliability of the forest fire risk assessment system, the applicability of the assessment system was verified through verification of applicability, correction, and supplementation through a survey of the actual conditions of areas affected by forest fires in Korea.

Keywords

Wildland-urban interface

Cultural heritage

Wildfire risk assessment

Investigation of wildfire damage

본 연구에서는 산림인접지의 문화재가 대형산불로 인한 피해저감하기 위해 진화장비의 접근성, 건축자재의 특성, 주변 임상의 조건, 소방자원의 확보 여부 등의 위험성 평가하여 산불 예방관리에 활용이 가능한 평가표를 개발하여 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 국외 산림인접 산불위험성 평가를 분석하고 국내 산불 피해 현장의 산불위험 요인 및 피해인자를 도출하여, 국내 실정에 맞는 문화재 산불위험성 평가표를 제시하였다. 또한 산불위험성 평가체계의 활용성 및 신뢰성을 높이기 위해 국내 산불피해지역의 실태조사를 통해 적용성 검증과 수정 및 보완을 통해 평가체계의 적용성을 확인하였다.

키워드

산림인접

문화재

산불위험성 평가

산불피해지 실태조사

References

Akinola. O.V., Adegoke. J. (2018). Assessment of forest fire vulnerability zones in Missouri, United States of America, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, Volume 26, 2019 - Issue 3, pp 251-527.
Butry D. , Donovan G. (2008). Protect the neighbor: investigating the spatial externalities of community wildfire hazard mitigation. Forest Science 54: 417-428.
Cohen J.D. (2000). Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry 98: 15-21.
Cohen J.D., Stratton R.D. (2008). Home destruction examination: Grass Valley Fire, Lake Arrowhead, California. USDA Forest Service, Technical Paper R5-TP-026b.
David R. Weise, Gregory S. Biging. (1997). A Qualitative comparison of fire spread models incorporating wind and slope effects. Forest Science 43(2): pp170-180.
Edmonton Alberta. (2008). FireSmart Guidebook for the Oil and Gas Industry.
Fujioka F.M, Gonzalez-Caben A., Chen S., Benoit J.W. (2011). An integrated weather/fire modeling system for fire risk assessment. International Conference on FIre Behaviour and Risk proceeding: 122-123.
GAO. (2005). Technology assessment: protecting structures and improving communications during wildland fires. GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, April 2005. US Government Accountability office. GAO-05-380.
McNarama D. (2007). Enhancing the Fire Dynamics Simulator for modeling wildland-urban interface fires. 2007 ESRI International User Conference Proceedings.
Menakis J.P., Cohen J., Bradshaw L. (2003). Mapping wildland fire risk to flammable structures fore conterminous Us. Proceeding of fire Conference 2000.
Richard C. Rothermel. (1972). A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA forest service research paper 1972.
Stewart S.I., Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B. (2003). Characteristics and location of the wildland-urban interface in the United States. @nd Interantional Wildland Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress. (http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/65316.pdf)
Thomas L. Saaty. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operation Research Vol. 48: 9-26.
William E. Mell, Samuel L. Manzello, Alexander Maranghides, David Butry, Ronald G. Rehm. (2010). The wildland-urban interface problem - current approaches and research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 2010, 19: 238-251.

Information

Publisher :National Heritage Disaster Prevention Society
Publisher(Ko) :국가유산방재학회
Journal Title :Journal of the Society of Cultural Heritage Disaster Prevention
Journal Title(Ko) :저널국가유산
Volume : 7
No :1
Pages :25-36

[1] Akinola. O.V., Adegoke. J. (2018). Assessment of forest fire vulnerability zones in Missouri, United States of America, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, Volume 26, 2019 - Issue 3, pp 251-527.

[2] Butry D. , Donovan G. (2008). Protect the neighbor: investigating the spatial externalities of community wildfire hazard mitigation. Forest Science 54: 417-428.

[3] Cohen J.D. (2000). Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry 98: 15-21.

[4] Cohen J.D., Stratton R.D. (2008). Home destruction examination: Grass Valley Fire, Lake Arrowhead, California. USDA Forest Service, Technical Paper R5-TP-026b.

[5] David R. Weise, Gregory S. Biging. (1997). A Qualitative comparison of fire spread models incorporating wind and slope effects. Forest Science 43(2): pp170-180.

[6] Edmonton Alberta. (2008). FireSmart Guidebook for the Oil and Gas Industry.

[7] Fujioka F.M, Gonzalez-Caben A., Chen S., Benoit J.W. (2011). An integrated weather/fire modeling system for fire risk assessment. International Conference on FIre Behaviour and Risk proceeding: 122-123.

[8] GAO. (2005). Technology assessment: protecting structures and improving communications during wildland fires. GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, April 2005. US Government Accountability office. GAO-05-380.

[9] McNarama D. (2007). Enhancing the Fire Dynamics Simulator for modeling wildland-urban interface fires. 2007 ESRI International User Conference Proceedings.

[10] Menakis J.P., Cohen J., Bradshaw L. (2003). Mapping wildland fire risk to flammable structures fore conterminous Us. Proceeding of fire Conference 2000.

[11] Richard C. Rothermel. (1972). A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA forest service research paper 1972.

[12] Stewart S.I., Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B. (2003). Characteristics and location of the wildland-urban interface in the United States. @nd Interantional Wildland Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress. (http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/65316.pdf)

[13] Thomas L. Saaty. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operation Research Vol. 48: 9-26.

[14] William E. Mell, Samuel L. Manzello, Alexander Maranghides, David Butry, Ronald G. Rehm. (2010). The wildland-urban interface problem - current approaches and research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 2010, 19: 238-251.

Journal National Heritage ISSN:3022-9200(Print) 3022-9383(Online) 저널 국가유산

All Issue