All Issue

2022 Vol.7, Issue 2 Preview Page

Article

31 August 2022. pp. 91-105
Abstract
This study focuses on examining conflict issues occurring in the process of restoring the forest fire-damaged areas, and searching for possibility of resolving conflicts by way of reviewing the consensus building case in the year of 2000 forest fire disaster. The issue is which approach the government should take in making a forest fire-damaged areas restoration plan between artificial forestation and natural recovery. Forest fire may act as a potential factor which destroys cultural assets, so it is needed to study how the forest fire-damaged areas should be restored. Results of this study shows the possibility of making a consensus between two different approaches in making a forest fire-damaged area restoration plan. Some recommendations are presented as follows: sustaining a consultative organization on a regular basis, making a rational and scientific restoration plan through a close investigation of damaged areas, making a consensus building in making and implementing a restoration plan, and quick release of information on emergency restoration measures, clear clearing, and construction of forest trails.
본 연구는 산불피해지 복구과정에서 발생하는 갈등의 쟁점을 진단하고, 복구계획수립에 관한 합의형성 사례분석을 통해 갈등의 해결가능성을 모색하는 데에 목적을 두었다. 대형 산불재난은 문화재 훼손의 잠재 인자로 작용할 수 있다는 점에서 중요성을 갖는다. 분석 결과, 갈등해결을 위한 협의기구에 이해관계자들이 적극적으로 참여하며 합의안 도출을 이루어냈다는 점을 알 수 있었으며 몇 가지 함의를 찾을 수 있었다. 산불피해지 복구를 둘러싼 갈등을 해결하기 위하여는 먼저, 산불피해지 복원을 위한 협의기구를 상시적으로 운영할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 피해지에 대한 정밀조사를 통해 합리적이고 과학적인 복원방안을 마련할 필요가 있다. 셋째, 복구계획안의 수립 및 이행과정에서의 신뢰구축 및 신뢰 유지가 필요하다. 마지막으로 산불피해지 응급복구, 모두베기, 임도건설 등에 관한 정보는 사전에 산주와 해당 지역주민에게 공개하는 것이 필요하다.
References
  1. Choi, B. A. (2022). In regard of woodcutting, forest trail, forest restoration, https://blog.naver.com/ilovewood/222726503598, 2022.5.9.
  2. Choi, B. S. (2022). Recovery fund for forest fire-damaged areas, needing to be scrutinized completely, guamcafe.tistory. https://guamcafe.tistory.com/6998, 2022.5.11.
  3. Choi, C. Y. (2022). ‘Need to change the goal of forest management’, Seeking for change in forest management to prevent huge fire and climate disaster - lesson from the past 25 years’ experience and educaion, Symposium hosted by Korean Federation for Environmental Movement, The Biodiversity Foundation, 2022.4.8.
  4. Chosun Ilbo (2003). Forest fire damage, natural restoration is better than afforestation, 2003.1.14.
  5. Choung, Y. S. (2022). ‘Need to change the paradigm of forest management to prevent huge forest fires–lessons from 20 years’ natural restoration’, Seeking for change in forest management to prevent huge fire and climate disaster - lesson from the past 25 years’ experience and educaion, Symposium hosted by Korean Federation for Environmental Movement, The Biodiversity Foundation, 2022.4.
  6. East Coast Forest Fire-damaged Areas Joint Examination Group (2000). Report on close examination of east coast forest fire area, 2000.12.
  7. Hankyoreh (2000). Flamed forest, natural restoration, Choung, Yeon Sook, 2000.4.27.
  8. Hankyoreh (2022). Forest fire-damaged forest, the best way is natural restoration, Choung, Yeon Sook, 2022.5.4.
  9. Hankyoreh21 (2022). Became the black forest, not pine tree forest in 20 years, 2022.6.16.
  10. Hong, S. H. (2022). ‘Strong forest against forest fire, how to manage?,’ Seeking for change in forest management to prevent huge fire and climate disaster - lesson from the past 25 years’ experience and education, Symposium hosted by Korean Federation for Environmental Movement, The Biodiversity Foundation, 2022.4.18.
  11. Hong, S. H. (2022). Questioning the fundamental causes of huge fires, https://blog.naver.com/ohmyjapan/222665208730, 2022.3.6.
  12. JoongAng Ilbo (2019). Year 2000 east coast forest fire, the greatest size among disastrous forest fires nationwide, 2019.4.5.
  13. JoongAng Ilbo (2020). Worst 20 years’ forest fires in the east coast, astonishing restoration power of the nature, 2020.6.2.
  14. JoongAng Ilbo (2022). Don’t have to cut the flamed trees despite the size of burning as much as 300 soccer fields, 2022.3.18.
  15. Kang Won Domin Ilbo (2022). Ask of the mountain owners on ways of restoring forest fire-damaged areas, Choi, Y. S. 2022.6.14.
  16. Kangwon Ilbo (2007). Natural restoration vs. Artificial afforestation, 2007.3.26
  17. KBS (2022). East coast forest fire-damaged areas, choose the natural restoration instead of artificial afforestation, 2022.5.11.
  18. Kim, G. B. (2021). From afforestation to natural restoration, presenting new paradigm of forest fire-damaged areas, ScienceBooks, https://sciencebooks.tistory.com/1588, 2021.5.14.
  19. Korea Arboreta and Gardens Institute (2022). An initiation report on making a strategy for restoring the forest ecosystem of forest fire-damaged areas. 2022.5.18.
  20. Korea Forest Service (2003). Result report on site examination of east coast restored areas from forest fire, 2003.11.
  21. Korea Forest Service (2019). Korea Forest Service, trying to compensate and restore forest fire-damaged areas, Press release, 2019.4.9.
  22. Korea Forest Service (2020). 9.5 bil. won for emergency woodcutting, additional budget input to speed up the recovery of forest fire-damaged areas, Press release, 2020.10.27.
  23. Korea Forest Service (2020). Land erosion control project to prevent the second damage at the huge forest fire-damaged areas, seeking for scientific approach, Press release, 2020.7.13.
  24. Korea Forest Service (2020). Symposium on future direction regarding Forest Fire-damaged Areas restoration, Press release, 2020.5.27.
  25. Korea Forest Service (2021). Forest woodcutting, stopping the full clearing and minimizing the impact on disaster・landscape, Press release, 2021.9.15.
  26. Korea Forest Service (2022). Forest fire-damaged areas, trying to make a rational restoration through communication, Press release, 2022.6.14
  27. Korea Forest Service (2022). Huge forest fires in our nation, Korea Forest Service Homepage, 2022.8.12.
  28. Korea Forest Service (2022). Number of mountain owners increased by 10 thousands, average size of mountain owners is 1.9ha, Press release, 2022.7.26.
  29. Korea Forest Service (2022). Trying to recover the forest fire-damaged areas in ecologically socially and economically rational direction - making restoration plans to sustain diverse values of forests, Press release, 2022.5.12.
  30. Korea Forest Service・National Institute of Forest Science (2006). Restoration manual of forest fire-damaged areas to restore healthy natural ecosystem and lasting forest restoration, 2006.
  31. Korean Federation for Environmental Movement (2022). Press conference for urging to recompose the joint examination group consisting of civilians, government officials, researchers in government-wide dimension for natural restoration of forest fire-damaged areas, 2022.5.11.
  32. Kyunghyang Shinmun (2022). The power of forest fire in spring season, spreading speed of 6m/s wind at 30 degree slope is 79 times as fast as flatland, 2022.4.10.
  33. Munhwa Ilbo (2022). Recovering the damage caused by forest fire and importance of forest infra, Choi, C. H. 2022.4.1.
  34. Naeil Shinmun (2022). Natural restoration is much faster than artificial afforestation in forest revival, 2022.4.11.
  35. Newsis (2020). Korea Forest Service, launching to recover forest fire-damaged areas in spring season by inputting 70 bil. won, 2020.6.1.
  36. Ohmynews (2022). East coast forest fire areas, stop full clearing and implement natural restoration, 2022.5.26.
  37. Sudo Ilbo (2022). A flamed forest, use money for natural restoration instead of artificial afforestation. 2022.7.6.
  38. Yonhap (2000). Unhappy mountain owners about restoration plan of damages caused by forest fire, 2000.11.6.
Information
  • Publisher :National Heritage Disaster Prevention Society
  • Publisher(Ko) :국가유산방재학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Society of Cultural Heritage Disaster Prevention
  • Journal Title(Ko) :저널국가유산
  • Volume : 7
  • No :2
  • Pages :91-105