Journal National Heritage ISSN:3022-9200(Print) 3022-9383(Online) 저널 국가유산

National heritage disaster prevention policy has advanced information-based response through CCTV, fire detectors, IoT sensors, integrated disaster information systems, and disaster safety situation rooms. For these facilities and organizations to function as actual response capacity, information collected at national heritage sites in mountainous areas must reach the situation room, and the situation room’s decisions and response instructions must in turn reach the field. This study examined how end-to-end disaster information delivery is regulated in national heritage statutes, enforcement decrees, administrative rules, publicly available performance-management documents, relevant published studies, and forest-disaster legislation. The analyzed public documents provide for information systems, situation-management organizations, multiple delivery channels, and network-failure management principles. However, no explicit criterion was identified within the scope of those documents for testing and determining whether information reaches its destination between the field and the situation room within the required time. A comparison with forest-disaster legislation showed that the Korea Heritage Service is designated as both a forest-disaster prevention related agency and a wildfire suppression agency and is required to maintain radio communication and other contact systems, but no explicit basis was identified for its use of the dedicated forest radio communication network. Unlike the provisions for static documents such as plans and risk maps, no explicit basis was identified for including the Korea Heritage Service in real-time situation-information delivery systems. In addition, national heritage is designated as a protection target immediately following human life, but no corresponding measure was identified in the stage-by-stage action items. This study conceptualizes this gap as disaster information delivery availability, proposes eight assessment items for end-to-end information delivery, and suggests incorporating them into existing procedures, including the annual review of disaster response manuals and wildfire-response analysis and evaluation.